Proving carbon dating wrong
Or to say it another way: there is a LOT of scientific evidence that suggests the Earth is perhaps only thousands of years old, and that the year age that evolution-believing "scientists" have LOUDLY and repeatedly proclaimed to be a fact, is actually based on a strong desire to eliminate God from His own Creation rather than on scientific facts.A "clock" is any geophysical or astronomical process that is changing at a constant rate.For as time goes by, the oil should seep into tiny pores in the surrounding rock, and, over time, reduce the pressure. Perhaps because our oil deposits were created as a result of Noah's Flood only about 4600 years ago?Some scientists say that after about 10,000 years little pressure should be left. Assuming that this rate has been constant in the past we can conclude that the earth would have been so hot only one million years ago that no life could have survived.From this they estimate the amount of helium that should be produced, and from these they can calculate how much helium is being added to the atmosphere over a given amount of time.They also know how much helium is currently in the atmosphere.If we assume a growth rate of one tree ring per year, then the oldest trees are between 4,500 and 4,767 years old.
Also, with regard to fossil tree rings, the author has been unable to find any documented instances of fossil trees having more than about 1500 rings.
All of the proposed theories as to where it came from have serious problems.
It is a complete mystery unless it was designed that way from the beginning.
When oil wells are drilled, the oil is almost always found to be under great pressure.
This presents a problem for those who claim "millions of years" for the age of oil, simply because rocks are porous.
Search for proving carbon dating wrong:
Therefore scientists must make a guess with regard to what they believe the original conditions might have been.