Redating the new testament updating electrical service

John vigorously runs a circuit tour, and visits and reorganizes and appoints beyond Asia, like a ‘man on a mission’, ‘full speed ahead’.

The word “tyrant” speaks clearly that John’s persecutor was a local Procurator, and NOT a distant Caesar who would have banished to Pontia, off the Italian Coast. Caesar would not have allotted John to some obscure island, living almost comfortably in a fishing village, (which is what Patmos was and is still today), somewhere in the Aegean.

They oft cite him as the authority for dating John's Apocalypse, and then ignore his other writings. Perhaps they are too busy copying the endnotes of their colleagues...perhaps they are too busy...perhaps philosophic arguments are simple a dinner exercise, and academic truths are as intangible as a good dinner conversation. Afterwards, John, the Disciple of the LORD – who also leaned upon His breast, -- did himself publish a Gospel during his residence at Ephesus of Asia.” Loosely translated and reiterated by me, for more impact: “Indeed, what is more, those Ephesus called out ones -- of Paul, certainly founded -- John however /moreover permanently in the presence / house of advanced all the way up to the times of Trajan as one who gives credible evidence as a true witness, testifying of the true Apostolic Tradition.” The purpose of the loose translation with reiteration is to see where the drive of the testimony is.

Irenaeus is a third generation witness from Jesus, and a second generation witness from John the Apostle. Scholar, Robinson, was interviewed by Time Magazine the following year, where he reiterated his claim, and challenged the academic world to prove him wrong. Therefore, I will use this same author and other early witnesses to show that they easily fail to invest a proper amount of time and effort on even just this one particular and most important topic -- in the dating of the New Testament. Church Leader in Rome, was what we consider a Third generation hearsay witness. Irenaeus in the Ante-Nicene Father translation and in the Latin, is claiming veracity and soundness based on a continued, unbroken, permanent presence of John...pushing an island exile back to a pre-Neroian era, and to a matter of months of separation between Paul and the Church of Ephesus. Further, we find from Irenaeus that he also had access to and learned from other unnamed elders and presbyters (beside Polycarp) who had conversed with John for many years.

He takes the position that Revelation was written around A. 95 while I and many others believe with good exegetical and historical reasons that it was written prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in A.

Ragan Ewing in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Theology degree at Dallas Theological Seminary, a bastion of dispensational thinking.

I do intend to keep this blog active, and to offer insightful information and/or opinion (and sometimes humor and/or entertainment on History from Nicene Era Thyatira tells of a 53-54 A. Apocalypse The post-Nicene 4th century apologist, Epiphanius (ca. D.), in Against Heresies / Panarion, declares that John wrote his Apocalypse during the (end of the) reign of Claudius Caesar. D.; then, according to recruitment requirements among Torah lawyers, John would have had to have been a minimum of 25 years of age for religious service under his Semikah rabbi. Hence, a death above 90, but not yet 100, and a fulfilling of what Epiphanius tells us, is that John was 95-97 at the time of his death.

The following is my reconstruction of the passages, in order to encapsulate what is being declared.“Even the people of Thyatira testify this is to be true … (The Holy Spirit) did foretell (the Apocalypse) through the mouth of John (the Apostle)… during the reign of Claudius Caesar…when he was upon the isle of Patmos.” Epiphanius, Against Heresies, 4.12.1Although this tradition was given through Thyatira of Asia to Epiphanius in the post-Nicene era; it was something that could be verified in the manuscripts of more than one Presbyter of Thyatira’s possession at that time. That is, John the Apostle's birth can now be calculated to the first 7 months of the Julian year of 1 A . Not, as some translators of Epiphanius have misrepresented in translating Epiphanius’ passage here, that John was above 90 when first coming to or from Patmos, or above 90 in the reign of Claudius Caesar (41-54 A. Clement of Alexandria, in saving the historically based tale of “A Rich Man who finds Salvation”, appears to support an early dating of the Apocalypse, saying: he [John] returned from the island of Patmos to Ephesus, and (then) being invited, went away to the neighboring Districts of the nations: appointing bishops here, setting Churches in order there, and ordaining such as were (made known to him) by the Spirit.” {Clement of Alexandria, “Who is the Rich Man who shall find Salvation?

Robinson8 have all recently supported the early date position.9 Moreover, this is far from novel.In Suetonius, 12 Caesars, Tiberius, .54 and Eusebius, History of the Church, 3.18; we see that the isle of Pontia, off the Italian Coast, was in use from at least the 20s to the 90s A. So, we ask, is there more to point to a local Provincial Official as tyrant, and a local Ephesian or Asian persecution than that of an Emperor?In the example of the grandsons of Judas, half-brother of Messiah, these were brought to ROME by the EVOCATUS in Domitian’s reign, but then were despised by the Emperor as “ignorant” and set free. Robinson, no conservative himself, comes to some startling conclusions in his groundbreaking book . The problem for Tommy is that there are lots of scholars that don’t agree with him, and the list is growing every year.

Search for redating the new testament:

redating the new testament-17

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “redating the new testament”